Photos in photojournalism have always been assumed as the most credible sources in the media line as they were taken by highly ethical photographers to present the truth to all the readers.
According to one of the article from The Guardian, ‘Photoshop is killing photojournalism’. Beechner stated that the journalism has becoming less credible compared to what it was in the past. Though there is evidence like the Stalin manipulated photo published in the newspaper way back before the editing soft wares are so common, doctoring photos are coming in as a ‘intruder’ to the photography’s authenticity aspect.
According to one of the article from The Guardian, ‘Photoshop is killing photojournalism’. Beechner stated that the journalism has becoming less credible compared to what it was in the past. Though there is evidence like the Stalin manipulated photo published in the newspaper way back before the editing soft wares are so common, doctoring photos are coming in as a ‘intruder’ to the photography’s authenticity aspect.
Stalin routinely air-brushed his enemies out of photographs. In this photograph a commissar (Nikolai Ivanovich Yezhov) was removed from the original photograph after falling out of favor with Stalin.Photographs as the salience of every type of publishing material (Kress, 2006), they provide the first impression to the reader to what the news or message is about. If the photographs are manipulated, reader’s meaning-making process would be deceived from that point. Even so, there is now manipulating ‘guide book’ given by the editors to fellow photographers to lead them to a more ‘professional way’ of ‘changing the truth.
Photojournalism is a combination of photography and journalism where the visual reporting most of the truth. ( Parrish, 2002). Parrish also stated where photographs will be meaningless if it is not being seen by anyone. So, in the end of the day, is still the audience perceiving the meaning behind every picture.
Do we want to see the very artistic point of view to the photographs that make us distort from the sense of reality? Especially in newspaper or magazine, ethically, photographers and editors have the responsible to report what it was in a rather neutral way than playing with reader’s mind by using various tools. Photoshop could be a very useful and creative invention in the first place for us to put our imagination to a rather substantial way.( Parrish, 2002) However, using it to negative purpose or unethically, is pretty much not recommended.
For more manipulated photos
Click on the link below:
-
Reference:
Beehner L., 2008, Photoshop is killing photojournalism, The Guardian UK, retrieved on 11 November 2008,
URL: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/16/photography.iran
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. 2006. Reading images. Chapter 6: The meaning of composition.
Parrish. F., 2002, Photojournalism An introduction, Wadsworth,United Kingdom
No comments:
Post a Comment